Leaf anatomy

center center The opening of the guard cells are influenced by the following factors

  • CO
  • Water vapour
  • Sunlight
  • Wind-speed at the leaf surface (in relation the boundary layer) also has an impact.

Functioning of the guard cells

center

NOTE

The stomata also opens up to other gases that may be harmful for the plant. We know that the mechanism is due to hormones but what exactly triggers this mechanism is not known.

Fick’s law of diffusion

The physical processes at the leaf are governed by diffusion

Transpiration

Photosynthesis

Catch

The stomatal conductance for water is measured to be 1.6 times that of CO

The difference is because of the fact that water molecules are smaller and have lesser molar weight (18 compared to 44 of CO)

Leaf water balance

center

where,

leaf capacitance evaporation stand for flow from soil to leaf

Stomatal conductance

The models improve in 3 stages:

  1. Empirical
    • Jarvis: start open, multiply penalties. No carbon link.
      • Guesses how open the pore is from the weather alone. Just fits the observed response to light, heat, dryness and CO never asks why the plant opens the pore in the first place.

g_{\mathrm{s}}=g_{\mathrm{s}, \max } f_{\mathrm{PAR}} f_{T_a} f_{\Psi_L} f_{\mathrm{VPD}L} f{\mathrm{CO}_2}

2. **Semi-empirical** - Ball–Berry: open $\propto$ photosynthesis (adds the carbon link). - *Stomata open in step with how much carbon the leaf is fixing, this is why they open. They close in dry air or high CO$_2$ to save water.* $$ g_s\propto A_n $$ - Leuning: minor tweak for dry air. $$ g_s\propto\frac{A_n}{\text{VPD}_L} $$ - *Same idea as Ball–Berry, just a more realistic response to dry air.* 3. **Optimisation** - Cowan–Farquhar: maximise carbon, minimise water. - *Stops fitting curves and assumes the plant is smart: open only as much as gives the most carbon for the least water lost. A cost–benefit principle, not a fitted rule.* - Medlyn: makes it usable. - *Turns that principle into a practical formula you can actually compute with.* > [!NOTE] Bell-berry model caveat > > ![[../Files/Pasted image 20260722205316.png|center|400]] > The model is not suitable for low carbon uptake because Ball–Berry ties opening to photosynthesis, it breaks down when photosynthesis is near zero (night, shade, stress). It wrongly predicts near-closed stomata when they're actually still open. > [!question] Are stomata really optimising? > > Optimising" means the plant acts as if trying to get the most carbon for the least water lost. Stomata behave close to optimally but that in itself isn't proof and since they can't predict the future or react instantly, we can't say they truly optimise. So: we don't know.